In Search of Soft Power Does foreign Public opinion Matter for US foreign Policy? By BenjaMIn e. GolDSMIth and YUSakU horIUchI*
ثبت نشده
چکیده
D “soft power” matter in international relations? Specifically, when the United States seeks cooperation from countries around the world, do the views of their publics about US foreign policy affect the actual foreign policy behavior of those countries? we examine this question using multinational surveys covering fifty-eight countries, combined with information about their foreign policy decisions in 2003, a critical year for the US during the post-9/11 period. we draw our basic conceptual framework from joseph nye, who coined the term “soft power.”1 according to nye, soft power is “the ability to get what you want through attraction rather than coercion or payments.”2 this is an especially appropriate framework for us because, as nye puts it, “soft power is about mobilizing cooperation from others.”3 as we do in this article, he frequently uses public opinion surveys regarding attitudes in foreign countries toward the US and its policies.4 It is also appropriate because the effectiveness of soft power hinges on the targeted country’s public attitudes (that is, favorability) toward the country wielding, or attempting to wield, international influence (in this study, the US).
منابع مشابه
Spinning the Globe? U.S. Public Diplomacy and Foreign Public Opinion
Global public opinion has emerged as an important factor affecting international relations. But have U.S. public diplomacy efforts during the post-9/11 period successfully improved foreign publics’ images of the U.S. and its foreign policy? We examine this question by estimating the effects of U.S. high-level visits to foreign countries on public opinion in those countries. Our compositional da...
متن کاملSecurity Strategy in US Foreign Policy; Intrinsic Contradiction with tanesh zodaee Policies of Islamic Republic of Iran (with an Emphasis on Nuclear Issue)
US politicians have found post cold war conditions an appropriate ground for the implementation of hegemonic stability with pivotal role of US. This issue has led to growing US intervention in various parts of the world. This article tries to answer this question: what decisions have been inspired by security and hegemony-seeking strategy in US foreign policy about Iran's nuclear issue? Initial...
متن کاملDearborn-Detroit Michigan: Ethnography of Faith and the U.S. Domestic and Foreign Policy Axis
The relationship between ethnic and faith communities in the United States and domestic forces relating to a converging and diverging social contract on the one hand, and US foreign, security and military policies in national, regional and global contexts on the other hand, constitutes the key focus of this paper and the ongoing research upon which it is based. Theories related to American ethn...
متن کاملتبیین سیاست خارجی آمریکا در مدیریت تحولات انقلابی- عربی: از سازه انگاری تا رویه ها و کنش های مبتنی بر معناهای بیرونی
America's foreign policy in the thick of happening of the revolutionary-Arabic transformations is marked in the route from the alliance to unilateralism. Basically, adopting this kind of strategy in foreign policy of the United States of America, on the one hand, is based on soft meaning-making in the Middle East, that occurs in the form of coalition and multilateral movements, including ex...
متن کاملThe Relationships Between Mass Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis
Democracy requires that citizens’ opinions play some role in shaping policy outcomes, including in foreign policy. Yet, although the literature on public opinion and foreign policy has made great progress in recent decades, scholars have reached no consensus concerning what the public thinks, or thinks about, with respect to foreign policy; how it comes to hold those opinions; or whether those ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012